Downloadable version [PDF 123K]
NCOW Press Release
Contact: Eileen Dannemann [phone: 917-804-0786, e-mail: ncowmail@gmail.com] Sept. 17, 2010
For Immediate Release:
Science Contact: Dr. Paul G. King, NCOW Sci. Advisor
[phone: 973-997-1321, e-mail: drking@gti.net]
CDC allegedly falsifies
reports--ignoring up to 3,587 Miscarriages from H1N1 Vaccine
A
shocking
report from the National Coalition of Organized Women (NCOW) presented data
from two different sources demonstrating that the 2009/10 H1N1 vaccines
contributed to an estimated 1,588 miscarriages and stillbirths. A corrected estimate may be as high as 3,587
cases. NCOW also highlights the
disturbing fact that the CDC failed to inform their vaccine providers of the incoming data of the reports of suspected H1N1
vaccine related fetal demise.
NCOW collected the data
from pregnant women (age 17-45 years) that occurred after they were
administered a 2009 A-H1N1 flu vaccine. The raw data is available on the
website.
Using
the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System
(VAERS), including updates through July 11, 2010 as a second ascertainment
source, capture-recapture statistical methods* were used to estimate the true number of miscarriages and
stillbirths following A-H1N1 flu vaccination in the U.S. Typically, even
so-called "complete" studies conducted by the CDC have been shown to
miss from 10% to 90% of the actual cases because of under-reporting.
The
statistical method employed is an expeditious and cost effective method of
attempting to ascertain a complete count of all cases when two or more
ascertainment sources (VAERS and NCOW survey) have failed to collect all the
existing cases. Overall, this approach shows that approximately only 15% of the
occurrences of a miscarriage or stillbirth were actually reported.
The
corrected estimate for the total number of 2009-A-H1N1-flu-shot-associated
miscarriages and stillbirths during the 2009/10-flu season is 1,588 (95%
goodness-of-fit confidence interval, 946 to 3587). That is, the lower and upper
range-probability of miscarriage and stillbirths due to the H1N1 vaccine was as
low as 946 and as high as 3,587.
Eileen Dannemann, Director of NCOW, presented
the findings for the second time to Dr. Marie McCormick, chair of the Vaccine
Risk and Assessment Working Group, during the Advisory Commission on
Childhood Vaccines (ACCV) meeting, Sept 3, 2010. Just prior to Ms.
Dannemann’s presentation Dr. McCormick, had pronounced that there were
absolutely no H1N1 vaccine-related adverse events in pregnant women in 2009/10,
directly contradicting the evidence publicly available. “This baseless and fallacious
assessment by the CDC assessment group” says, Dannemann, “has given the green
light to the CDC's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) to
continue their recommendation to give the 2010/11 flu shot to all people,
including pregnant women. This upcoming 2010/11 flu vaccine contains the same
elements that are implicated in the killing of these fetuses, the H1N1 viral
component and the neurotoxin mercury (Thimerosal). Additionally, it contains 2
other viral strains- a 3 in 1 shot for all people”.
The very next week at the Sept 14th
National Vaccine Advisory Committee (NVAC) meeting Dr. McCormick, (despite
having been informed on two previous occasions of the VAERS data) pronounced,
once again, that there were no adverse events in pregnant women. At the
conclusion of the NVAC meeting, during public comment, Dannemann submitted the
data for the 3rd time and concluded with, “Why hasn’t Dr. McCormick
looked in the VAERS data base?” “She
looked where she knew she would not find”, a disquieting thought, Ms.
Dannemann, said in retrospect.
“Initially, at the beginning of the H1N1
pandemic consequence management drill there were allegedly 30 maternal
deaths. It was these deaths that the
CDC used as the basis to initiate a strenuous and aggressive campaign to
vaccinate the pregnant population with the untested H1N1 vaccine. The CDC ascertained that there were
eventually a total of 56 maternal deaths (assuming the fetuses died with
them). Dr. Alicia Siston’s JAMA study
(CDC) acknowledged that most of these deaths were ‘unconfirmed’ H1N1 virus
caused deaths despite the fact that the CDC had tests that could have verified,
for certain, that these were H1N1 related deaths.
Vaccine-related fetal demise reports from VAERS
increased 2,440%--from 7 cases in 2007/8 to 178 in 2009/10. Seventy deaths reported
from another source had 7 overlapping cases with VAERS, yielding 241 unique
cases. Simplistically speaking, it
would have been 85 to 192 times safer not to vaccinate from the perspective of
the in-utero child.
Considering that the total of 56 maternal deaths
in Dr. Alicia’s Siston’s study, allegedly due to the H1N1 virus itself, are
unverified and in light of the overwhelming adverse events reported, we
emphasize that inoculating pregnant women with another untested vaccine
containing a combination of components found in the offending 2009 H1N1 vaccine
is insupportable. Thus, it must be argued that the CDC was grossly negligent to
fail to inform their vaccine providers of the incoming VAERS data, while
providers blindly followed the CDC “standard of care” guidelines to vaccinate
every pregnant woman in 2009/10.
Furthermore, in the face of these findings and the purposeful
withholding of these findings by CDC’s Dr. Marie McCormick and her vaccine risk
assessment group, for the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices
(ACIP) to recommend another iteration of the same vaccine to pregnant women in
2010/11 may be argued as more than gross negligence -but rather- an act of
willful misconduct.
We strongly recommend that the CDC withdraws
their continued recommendation to pregnant women, instead, strictly adhering to
the FDA/manufacturers warning on the insert packages that the flu shot not be
given to pregnant women unless clearly needed.
As well, we suggest that the CDC advise all Ob/Gyns, vaccine providers
and the public this year, of last season’s VAERS reports on H1N1
vaccine-related fetal deaths” despite the fact that it may be contrary to CDC’s
vaccine uptake performance goals”.
*Gary S. Goldman,
Ph.D, author of various peer-reviewed medical journal publications, has verified
the capture-recapture
(C-R) figures published in the NCOW
report. Dr. Goldman previously worked
for 8 years as a Research Analyst for the L.A. County Department of Health
Services in an epidemiological study project funded by the CDC.